GambleGamesHow we score
A score is only useful if you can argue with it. So here is exactly what goes into one, and where the numbers come from.
Where the facts come from
We read the provider's own website, public API documentation, press releases and the studio lists they publish. Every count on the site (games, studios, markets, clients) carries the month we read it, because these numbers move every few weeks. When a vendor publishes nothing on a point, the page says "not published". We do not fill gaps with estimates.
Overall score for game aggregators
| Criterion | Weight | What we look at |
|---|---|---|
| Catalogue | 25% | Published game and studio counts, presence of the studios operators ask for most, formats beyond slots (live, crash, table, virtuals, sportsbook) |
| API and wallet | 20% | Seamless or transfer wallet, one integration for every product, open documentation, test environment |
| Time to launch | 15% | How long the vendor says integration takes and how fast an operator gets credentials |
| Cost of entry | 15% | Setup, integration and monthly fees, minimum commitments, whether pricing is published |
| Operator tools | 10% | Free rounds, tournaments, jackpots, bonus tooling, back office |
| Currencies and markets | 10% | Fiat and crypto coverage, per-player currency, markets served |
| Support | 5% | Channels, languages, account management |
Aggregator scores on this grid
Each criterion gets a mark out of 10 from the dated facts on the provider page. The overall score is the weighted average, rounded to one decimal. It is the same number on the provider page, in the overall aggregator ranking, on the home page and in llms.txt. Scores as of October 2026.
Game studios and sportsbook providers
Studios are scored on the strength of their best-known titles, release pace, range of formats, how widely they are distributed through aggregators, and promotional tools for operators. Sportsbook and odds providers are scored on event coverage, in-play depth, esports coverage, integration model (API, iframe, turnkey), trading and risk services, and time to launch.
Rankings by criterion
Each ranking page lists its own criteria at the top. A provider with a modest overall score can lead a ranking that only asks one question, such as "which aggregator charges nothing to integrate?". That is intended. On those pages the number next to each name is labelled "ranking score": it is valid for that list only, and the provider's overall score is shown beside it. The one exception is the best casino game aggregators page, which ranks on the overall score itself.
Commercial relationships
GambleGames has commercial relationships with some listed companies, including SoftAggregator, Nocturn Play and Nocturn Sport. They are scored on the same grid as everyone else, and no position is for sale. Where one of them is weaker on a criterion, the page says so.
Corrections
Vendors and readers can send corrections with a public source to [email protected]. We check the source and update the page and its date.